|
CALL
for WORKSHOPS
8th SMES Seminar - Prague 17-19 June 2004
The workshops will
constitute
the core of the seminar.
The
five partner countries in Dignity and Health 5-Projects working on the proposed
five topics, and each
of local co-ordinator will act as chairperson of the one of 5
workshops which will compose the Prague Seminar, and
with another european expert, as animator of
session.
In this initial phase you are kindly asked to express
your preference – before the 1st APRIL –
for one of the workshops, offering proposals
and concrete suggestions.
The second phase will
begin in April, after the small Warsaw seminar, when the Health and
Dignity –5P partners will contact individually all those who have shown an
interest, in order to finalise contributions within the general
framework of the programme.
This is where reflection on an exchange of ideas
should be translated into proposals of integrated and innovational
practices, planned synergetic strategies and a denunciation of the
contradictions and failings in five of the ten exclusion factors which
ought to be converted into inclusion factors
-
low/inadequate income,
-
low quality or absence of employment,
-
low level of education and training and
illiteracy
-
health problems and difficult living
conditions,
-
housing problems and homelessness.
|
|
WORKSHOP TOPICS:
You are keenly advised -
in preparing your participation in workshop - to
read:
JOINT REPORT ON SOCIAL INCLUSION
,
and/or the NAP/incl of your country.
(cf. LINKS)
|
|
1. Health /mental health: Right - Access - Services
No Dignity without Health - No Health
without Mental Health |
Neil DAVIS |
|
|
 |
|
|
Objective :
To increase the knowledge of the participants about “EU law and
application - common objectives – appropriate practices”, with
reference to the NAPs Inc. and to JIM.
To analyse the efficient practices and the legislation
(concretely and daily applied !..) about health & social system in order to propose
innovative and adequate instruments for the promotion of equal access to : RIGHTS - HEALTH - SOCIAL SERVICES and
ADEQUATE RESOURCES, for excluded
people.
Questions:
1. What kind of barriers make hard
the acces to health services for excluded people, especially
homeless ?
And in simmetric way barriers who make difficult for
mental illnes people the access to social services, especially
housing services ?
2.
When the barriers and /or the insufficiences are
"structural - insitutional - individual : in what way it's possible
to reduce
or surround or broken in order to facilitate "reciprocal
access at part of responsability in co-working
Does the NAPS &
JIM increase the accessibility and quality of Health
& Mental Health Services for disadvantaged people by preventing,
assisting and accompanying this vulnerable, marginalised, and
excluded people or not ?
3. Does these ensure a sustainable inclusion and active
participation in citizenship ? |
|
|
2. Resources:
decent income &
adequate resources for good health |
Marieta RADU |
|
|
 |
|
|
Background (few lines from Join
Report 2003 about NAP/Incl)
The income & health-
A substantial number of people living above a relative income poverty line
may not be able to satisfy at least one of the needs identified as basic,
due to the detrimental influence of such factors
as health
condition,
security of work income, need of extra care for elderly or disabled
members of the household, etc.
There is much evidence that children growing up in poverty tend to do less
well educationally, have poorer health..
The Poor Health:
There is a widespread understanding that poor health is both a cause and a
consequence of wider socio-economic difficulties.
The overall
health status of the population tends to be weaker in lower income groups.
The percentage of people claiming their health to be (very) bad was
significantly higher for those below the risk of poverty line than for
those above it in the Union ...
the strong
correlation between poor health and poverty and exclusion.
Particularly vulnerable groups such as the Roma and Travellers have poor
life expectancy and higher rates of infant mortality. This correlation
depends on various factors but in particular on the extent to which
adverse social and environmental factors, which are experienced
disproportionately by people on low incomes, can make it difficult for
individuals to make healthier choices.
Reflections &
Questions:
|
|
|
3. HOUSE:
right - accessibility
&
quality - barriers
NO DIGNITY without equal
access to House RIGHT
NO HEALTH without decent & sustainable HOUSE |
Douhomir
MINEV |
|
|
 |
|
|
Background (few lines from Join
Report 2003 about NAP/Incl)
Reflections &
Questions:
A. “Home
– chez-soi” as a fundamental right of all person ! In what
way the legislations and local administrative
disposition guaranteed
the divers “alternative” to "street" and to "institution", in order
to insure the real “dignity” of
person who is in disadvantaged and
vulnerable conditions ?
B. People suffering of “psychical/mental disturb” has – as
all people - the right to “house” and what kind of "house" ?
* before: in order to prevent hospitalisation;
* during: in order to propose alternative to
institutionalisation;
* after: in order to support and monitoring a sustainable
“home life”.
C.
In what way the the NAPS & JIM increase the accessibility
& quality
to Home and to Housing services for
disadvantaged people by preventing,
assisting and accompanying this vulnerable, marginalised, and
excluded people
(all the kind of "home-less...") ?
D. What local
application, daily practices, pilot projects ?…:
Does these ensure a sustainable inclusion and active
participation in housing management?
Difficulties, solutions & proposals…
|
|
|
4. Job :
no dignity and no health without job right. |
 |
|
Background (few lines from Join
Report 2003 about NAP/Incl)
Reflections & Questions:
1. “Job”
as a fundamental right of all person ! In what way the
legislations and local administrative disposition
guaranteed the
divers “alternative” to ""employment" and to labour "market", in
order to insure the real “dignity” of
person who is in disadvantaged
and vulnerable conditions ? For ex. : illegal immigrants ?
2. The "job" before all, before charity, before housing,
before treatment !
Any people in order to affirm "self dignity" and
find again "health and well being"
to claim before all the job ! Job not necessarily at
place of house & treatment, when
necessary, but every time with !...
What kind of initiative propose "local authorities" -
"administrators" - "trade
Union" - "Organisation" ?...
3. People suffering of “psychical/mental disturb” has – as
all people - the right to “job” and what kind of "job" ?
* Adequate & Correct : in order
to respect dignity and health, promoting training ..
* Remunerated : in order to propose
remuneration in justice any alternatives to ...
* Participative: in order to
insure support and monitoring a sustainable “home life”.
4.
In what way the NAPS & JIM increase the
accessibility & quality of Job and to Job services for
vulnerable &
disadvantaged people by preventing, assisting and
accompanying this vulnerable, marginalised, and excluded people
...... (all the kind of "home-less...") ?
5. What local
application, daily practices, pilot projects ?…:
Does
these ensure a sustainable inclusion and active
participation in job
management?
Difficulties, solutions & proposals…
|
|
|
5. Education & street:
the children and young people
of the street without right, dignity and health |
 |
|
Background : In most countries
children experience levels of income poverty that
are higher than those for adults. Material
deprivation among children must be a matter of serious concern, as it is
generally recognised to affect their development and future opportunities.
In 2001, rates of poverty risk for children were of 24% or more in Spain,
Ireland, Italy, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Differences in the
persistence of child poverty relative to adults are also significant (12%
as against 9% for the EU as a whole), which suggests that specific factors
shape the risks of poverty faced by children relative to those faced by
the entire population.
* We must prevent early school leaving and promote smooth
transition from school to work.
* We must develop a focus on eliminating child poverty and social
exclusion among children;
Reflections & Questions:
1. “Education”
as a fundamental right of all person ! In what way the
legislations and local administrative disposition
guaranteed...., in order to protect and insure the real “dignity
- well being - happy living” for children who live in
disadvantaged
and vulnerable conditions ?...
2. From "institutionalisation" in large and anonymous
college to family small communities....
3. The "school of the street" in on side and in other
side what are the new opportunities & alternatives proposed as
education and protection against exploitation,
violence, "body market"..., illegal job...
4. The proposed future for children suffering of “lack of
identity models" .... as alternative to "addiction" and "band".
5.
In what way the NAPS & JIM increase the
respect, protection and evolution for the children in society....
6.
What local
application, daily practices, pilot projects ?…:
Difficulties, solutions & proposals…
 
|
|
|
|
|
|