Dignity & Health/II-2Projects      
ROMA 09-12 February 2005
d o c u m e n t s

 HOME

DIGNITA & SALUTE PROGRAM EXCHANGE/VISITS EVALUATIONS REPORT Updated:  03/06/09

1.   ITALY NAP/incl  &  EU - Social Inclusion Documents

1.

NAPs/incl: National Action Plans of Italy 2004   it   it

 Annex 1: it it      Annex 2: it it    Annex 3: it   it

2.

Social Protection Committee

3.

Common Objectives     

4.

National Action Plans against poverty and social exclusion;    

5.

Joint Memoranda on Social Inclusion  

6.

Joint Reports on Social Inclusion (Sept.- Dec. 2003) 

7.

Common Indicators

8.

Community Action Programme

9.

Studies Regional indicators to reflect social exclusion and poverty;

10.

Non-governmental Expert Reports on National Action Plans (June 2001-03)

2.   Commission’s proposal for a renewed Lisbon strategy  [03/02/2005]


Working together for growth and jobs - A new start for the Lisbon Strategy
 
The European Commission presented - on 2 February - a new strategy aimed at revitalizing the so-called Lisbon agenda. In its communication to the Spring European Council, entitled Working together for growth and jobs - A new start for the Lisbon Strategy, the Commission confirms that, five years after its launch, the Lisbon Strategy is not on track to deliver the expected results.

The Commission sets out an action programme for the EU and its Member States to generate « sustained economic growth and more and better jobs ». It calls on Member States to launch a new EU partnership for growth and jobs at the Spring European Council of 22-23 March. The Commission believes that a renewed drive and focus on the following (fewer, “achievable”) objectives are necessary:

  • Making Europe a more attractive place to invest and work;

  • Developing Knowledge and innovation for growth;

  • Creating more and better jobs, by attracting more people into employment in particular through action to reduce youth unemployment (European Youth initiative) and modernising social protection systems, as well as by increasing the adaptability of workers and enterprises and the flexibility of labour markets through removing obstacles to labour mobility.

The Commission’s proposal identifies responsibilities, sets deadlines and measures progress. It makes a clear distinction between actions at Member States and European Union level. The Commission proposes a complete overhaul of how the renewed Lisbon Strategy is implemented:

  • A single National Action Programme for growth and jobs, adopted by national governments after discussion with their parliaments. These National Lisbon programmes would become the major reporting tool on economic and employment measures. “This will greatly simplify the myriad of existing reports under the Open Method of Co-ordination, which the Commission will review”, stresses the Commission.

  • Member States would appoint a Mr or Mrs Lisbon at government level charged with co-ordinating the different elements of the strategy and presenting the Lisbon programme.

This simplification at national level would be mirrored at Community level by integrating in a single package the existing economic and employment co-ordination mechanisms (under the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines and Employment Guidelines): this will be done in a Strategic Annual Report which will be published annually in January. (Source: EC)

More info at: http://europa.eu.int/growthandjobs/index_en.htm                                          top top
 

3.   THE  SOCIAL REGULATORY PLAN  OF THE CITY OF ROME


SYNTHETIC FRAMEWORK OF THE SOCIAL REGULATORY PLAN  OF THE CITY OF ROME

The law no 328/2000, indicate the basic goals for a social service integrated system,
the services have new tasks and resources, and represents a highly integrated public-private initiative.

In the Plan there are six areas of action each with it’s own objectives and measures:
   1.      welfare actions
   2.      system actions
   3.      integration actions
   4.      joined planning between Urbanistic Regulatory Plan and Social Regulatory Plan
   5.      objective projects (plans  for target group: child, older, immigrants..)
   6.      structure of the stretch budget

 In the welfare actions we have six actions:
   ·        access to services
   ·        civic responsibility
   ·        responsible system of welfare
   ·        social inclusion and autonomy
   ·        welfare residential (type: elders, minors, homeless…)
   ·        intervention of social emergency

This structure assures both the unity of service for the overall dimension of the citizens of Rome  for all its citizens and for specific local needs (welfare for individual district).

Our objective is to assure all social services at essential levels to all.

Dignity and Health-Rights and Access, What does the Municipality of Rome do?

 
MEASURES-SUPPORT FOR THE HOMELESS

 We can estimate that around 2.000 people live on the streets and around 6.000 live in temporary accommodation and emergency shelters. 1/3 have psychiatric disturbances, 1/3 have alcoholism problems, and a 1/3 is made up of drug addicts.

Extension of rights

Residency represents a right/duty of each citizen, in spite of his or her living conditions. Residency allows one to be a citizen (renew documents, get the pension, exercise the right to vote).

Since 2002 the homeless people can obtain Official Domicile at theirs District Via Modesta Valenti, an official domicile for the homeless  instituted in memory of an elderly woman who died in privation at the Termini Station after an ambulance didn’t care for her because she was dirty.

In Rome there are 19 official domiciles Modesta Valenti, one for each District.


Dignity to have first aid

In February 2002  the Social Operation Room was launched with a view to guaranteeing rapid reaction in social emergencies: it is free of charge and active 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, holidays included.

All citizens of the municipality of Rome can access the service by applying directly or after being brought to the attention of the relevant authorities. No formal requirements have to be met to use it. Applications are to be filed by telephone, calling a toll-free number. Emergency actions target all socially disadvantaged people.

The SOS service consists in three integrated operational levels:

1.      Operation room it is located in the premises of the municipality of rome’s 5th Department. Experts are always ready to take calls, analyse and interpret them, assess any request, define and activate actions accordingly.

2.      Mobile Units   9mobile units are always operational in the field, and are permanently connected to the operation room through a satellite system. The personnel of each mobile units consist of two vocational trainers and a home carer with a total of 36 staff working in shifts. Those units react rapidly to any request by carrying out the required actions on the spot, meanwhile activating the relevant institutional actors in order to identify the resources available. Thanks to their constant presence in the field, mobile units can identify situations of marginalization that would otherwise be undetectable; they contact invisible users, who would otherwise only become visible when the situation is unmanageable, thus playing an extremely significant preventive role.

3.      Office experts these social workers or psychologists act
constantly as links with local social and health services.

Structuring/Organization

Those without a fixed abode are mainly an itinerant population. This shows the importance for a flexible articulation of the specific services geared towards them, therefore there is a need to provide the services for these people in two areas: citizen and municipal.

Citizen related services for a population in transit which has not obtained residency or, even if with a residency, does not live in the defined territory

    
Social emergenc
y

Primary and secondary shelters, the people who use these centres, night and day, are those which do not have significant connections with the area or they do have connections in the area which do not coincide with those at the shelter structures. These in fact, in relation to the type of population which they turn to, have relationships with more than one town hall.

Possible economical hotel structures.


Services at municipal level or in proximity
, geared towards a permanent population:

Family house: the area importance has shown the necessity, within a social reintegration programme, that this type of structure interweaves connections with the neighbourhood to allow a connection between the area and the people received.

Specific shelter for the resident family nucleus.

Economic hardship - right to housing
One of the most significant prevention areas regards the housing policy. Resolution number 163/98 which offers economic support, rent, has an important prevention function, necessary to avoid the entry into the circuit for people with no fixed abode to those who have just lost a home and the consequent chronic process of social exclusion.

 

 Proposals – Priorities
 a) Set up a permanent work table dedicated to people with no fixed abode open to the
     workers in the sector. The table will also be open to people who live with hardship.

 b) Carry on to increase the overall places in the first shelter (or called basic level)
     at a citizen level.

 c) Continue with the policy of small sized shelter structures spread throughout the area.

 d) To expec t a system which allows the permanent stay of guests in the secondary shelter
 
    centres not any more on the basis of a prefixed time in a contract, but rather on the basis
     of intervention projects carried out periodically to check the situation, with also the
     participation of all the interested area services.

 e) Work for the projects. The micro project, as a starting point for the taking on the person
     with no fixed abode, which allows, a constant verification of the team’s work and the
     programme of the person taken on.

 f) Training of the social workers who work in the extreme poverty sector.

Dignity to have medical treatment: in Rome there is a list of doctors on health insurance panel available to work with homeless

 

MEASURES-SUPPORT FOR PEOPLE  WITH MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS

Rome is a capital city without a mental hospital. In recent years much has been done in the mental health field, thanks to the joint cooperation between the City Council and the five Mental Health Departments of the Local Health Units. The collaboration with the departments has allowed, among other things, the setting up and running of 24 day centres, 16 social assistance residences and 19 personalised apartments. Certainly, regarding the needs and the new urgencies, the work to be done is still notable, which needs greater coordination of the forces in the field, so that all can use the services, the treatment, the resources. The collaboration and support initiatives between the council authority and the Local Health Units have identified different sectors:


Day Centres

There are 24 so called intermediate structures, located in a capillary way within the whole citizen area, they mainly receive serious psychotic patient, in the 20 to 45 age group. Each centre is open for eight hours daily, from Monday to Friday, with the presence of a multi skilled team from the Local Health Unit responsible for the therapeutic rehabilitation project and the health related activities, both for the workers within the social cooperatives, chosen by the Local Health Units, which manage the recreation and expression activities as well as the professional training. Within each centre it is foreseen, meetings between the workers and the patients and specific meetings with the families and the users to verify the work carried out and to build a rapport of collaboration, important for the development of the patient’s therapeutic project.

Residential Stay

The residences are low assistance level structures, directed towards patients who have reached a sufficient level of autonomy and who have a discrete possibility to experiment with normal living conditions. The residences are categorised into two types:

-  16 social assistance residences (low assistance level structures and/or self managed). They are structures which can receive up to a maximum of six patients. They represent a housing solution outside the protected psychiatric circuit and which foresee, organised assistance in daily living through the presence of trained personnel and/or volunteers for the support activities in daily life.

-  19 personalised apartments. They represent housing solutions for users with a sufficient level of autonomy. The project is carried out in owned apartments rented to the same. The increase in personalised housing is foreseen (from one to four people), that is the housing which allows to progressively leave the psychiatric structures for a definitive social integration.

-  These are projects which aid the work integration of citizens with mental problems both, both through the setting up of new productive activities managed by the social cooperatives, and the setting up of schemes to recover and re qualify degraded green areas. articulated in the by now long term different experimented forms (short breaks, trips, week end) constitutes a fundamental opportunity to verify the rehabilitation and therapeutic interventions undertaken by the services during the year.

Training, awareness and prevention  these are initiatives geared towards the associations and family members, social health workers, social cooperatives, and even all citizens to encourage a cultural change and the change of attitudes regarding mental illness to increase the experience of social and employment reintegration of citizens with mental health problems.      


Transfer of economic cheques  the economic contributions for the realisation of personal projects (work placement, economic support, residency…) are paid annually to the psychiatric patients.

top top

6.   WHO : MENTAL HEALTH  IN EUROPE & WORLD

Mental health in Europe

Throughout the WHO European Region, illness and death related to mental disorders are rising. Common problems include stress, helplessness and loss of identity and social cohesion. One in four people experience at least one significant episode of mental ill health during their lives. During any one year, 30 million people in the Region are estimated to suffer from major depression. Neuropsychiatric disorders are estimated to account for 19.5% of the burden of disease in the Region. But, on average, the mental health budget constitutes only 5.8% of a country's total health expenditure. Most countries have few or no services designed for young people.

What can be done

Health promotion, early intervention in crises and innovative care and rehabilitation can improve mental health.
Many countries are restructuring their services to reflect the latest knowledge and experience; others have yet to begin this process. All countries have to work with limited resources. Too often, prejudice and stigma hamper the development of mental health policies, and are reflected in poor services, low status for care providers and a lack of human rights for mentally ill people. The commitments in the Conference declaration and action plan will be based on information and evidence on the situation in the European Region.


WHO European Ministerial Conference on Mental Health

Mental Health Declaration for Europe Facing the Challenges,
Building Solutions

Helsinki, Finland, 12–15 January 2005  http://www.euro.who.int/mentalhealth2005


Preamble


1.   We, the Ministers of Health of Member States in the European Region of the World Health Organization (WHO),
in the presence of the European Commissioner for Health and Consumer Protection, together with the WHO Regional Director for Europe, meeting at the WHO Ministerial Conference on Mental Health, held in Helsinki from 12 to 15 January 2005, acknowledge that mental health and mental well-being are fundamental to the quality of life and productivity of individuals, families, communities and nations, enabling people to experience life as meaningful and to be creative and active citizens. We believe that the primary aim of mental health activity is to enhance people’s well-being and functioning by focusing on their strengths and resources, reinforcing resilience and enhancing protective external factors

2.   We recognize that the promotion of mental health and the prevention, treatment, care and rehabilitation of mental health problems are a priority for WHO and its Member States, the European Union (EU) and the Council of Europe, as expressed in resolutions by the World Health Assembly and the WHO Executive Board, the WHO Regional Committee for Europe and the Council of the European Union. These resolutions urge Member States, WHO, the EU and the Council of Europe to take action to relieve the burden of mental health problems and to improve mental well-being.

3.   We recall our commitment to resolution EUR/RC51/R5 on the Athens Declaration on Mental Health, Man-made Disasters, Stigma and Community Care and to resolution EUR/RC53/R4 adopted by the WHO Regional Committee for Europe in September 2003, expressing concern that the disease burden from mental disorders in Europe is not diminishing and that many people with mental health problems do not receive the treatment and care they need, despite the development of effective interventions. The Regional Committee requested the Regional Director to:

  • give high priority to mental health issues when implementing activities concerning the update of the Health for All policy;

  • arrange a ministerial conference on mental health in Europe in Helsinki in January 2005

4.   We note resolutions that support an action programme on mental health. Resolution EB109.R8, adopted by the WHO Executive Board in January 2002, supported by World Health Assembly resolution WHA55.10 in May 2002, calls on WHO Member States to

  • adopt the recommendations contained in The world health report 2001;

  • establish mental health policies, programmes and legislation based on current knowledge and considerations regarding human rights, in consultation with all stakeholders in mental health;

  • increase investment in mental health, both within countries and in bilateral and multilateral cooperation, as an integral component of the well-being of populations.

5.   Resolutions of the Council of the European Union, recommendations of the Council of Europe and WHO resolutions dating back to 1975 recognize the important role of mental health promotion and the damaging association between mental health problems and social marginalization, unemployment, homelessness and alcohol and other substance use disorders. We accept the importance of the provisions of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, of the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and of the European Social Charter, as well as the Council of Europe’s commitment to the protection and promotion of mental health which has been developed through the Declaration of its Ministerial Conference on Mental Health in the Future (Stockholm, 1985) and through its other recommendations adopted in this field, in particular Recommendation R(90)22 on protection of the mental health of certain vulnerable groups in society and Recommendation Rec(2004)10 concerning the protection of the human rights and dignity of persons with mental disorder.

Scope

6.   We note that many aspects of mental health policy and services are experiencing a transformation across the European Region. Policy and services are striving to achieve social inclusion and equity, taking a comprehensive view of the balance between the needs and benefits of diverse mental health activities aimed at the population as a whole, groups at risk and people with mental health problems. Services are being provided in a wide range of community-based settings and no longer exclusively in isolated and large institutions. We believe that this is the right and necessary direction. We welcome the fact that policy and practice on mental health now cover:

  • the promotion of mental well-being;

  • the tackling of stigma, discrimination and social exclusion;

  • the prevention of mental health problems;

  • care for people with mental health problems, providing comprehensive and effective services and interventions, offering service users and carers1 involvement and choice;

  • the recovery and inclusion into society of those who have experienced serious mental health problems.

Priorities

7.   We need to build on the platform of reform and modernization in the WHO European Region, learn from our shared experiences and be aware of the unique characteristics of individual countries. We believe that the main priorities for the next decade are to:

  • foster awareness of the importance of mental well-being;

  • collectively tackle stigma, discrimination and inequality, and empower and support people with mental health problems and their families to be actively engaged in this process;

  • design and implement comprehensive, integrated and efficient mental health systems that cover promotion, prevention, treatment and rehabilitation, care and recovery;
    (1) The term "carer" is used here to describe a family member, friend or other informal care-giver.

  • address the need for a competent workforce, effective in all these areas;

  • recognize the experience and knowledge of service users and carers as an important basis for planning and developing mental health services.

Actions

8.   We endorse the statement that there is no health without mental health. Mental health is central to the human, social and economic capital of nations and should therefore be considered as an integral and essential part of other public policy areas such as human rights, social care, education and employment. Therefore we, ministers responsible for health, commit ourselves, subject to national constitutional structures and responsibilities, to recognizing the need for comprehensive evidence-based mental health policies and to considering ways and means of developing, implementing and reinforcing such policies in our countries. These policies, aimed at achieving mental well-being and social inclusion of people with mental health problems, require actions in the following areas:

  • promote the mental well-being of the population as a whole by measures that aim to create awareness and positive change for individuals and families, communities and civil society, educational and working environments, and governments and national agencies;

  • consider the potential impact of all public policies on mental health, with particular attention to vulnerable groups, demonstrating the centrality of mental health in building a healthy, inclusive and productive society;

  • tackle stigma and discrimination, ensure the protection of human rights and dignity and implement the necessary legislation in order to empower people at risk or suffering from mental health problems and disabilities to participate fully and equally in society;

  • offer targeted support and interventions sensitive to the life stages of people at risk, particularly the parenting and education of children and young people and the care of older people;

  • develop and implement measures to reduce the preventable causes of mental health problems, comorbidity and suicide;

  • build up the capacity and ability of general practitioners and primary care services, networking with specialized medical and non-medical care, to offer effective access, identification and treatments to people with mental health problems;

  • offer people with severe mental health problems effective and comprehensive care and treatment in a range of settings and in a manner which respects their personal preferences and protects them from neglect and abuse;

  • establish partnership, coordination and leadership across regions, countries, sectors and agencies that have an influence on the mental health and social inclusion of individuals and families, groups and communities;

  • design recruitment and education and training programmes to create a sufficient and competent multidisciplinary workforce;

  • assess the mental health status and needs of the population, specific groups and individuals in a manner that allows comparison nationally and internationally;

  • provide fair and adequate financial resources to deliver these aims;

  • initiate research and support evaluation and dissemination of the above actions.

9.   We recognize the importance and the urgency of facing the challenges and building solutions based on evidence. We therefore endorse the Mental Health Action Plan for Europe and support its implementation across the WHO European Region, each country adapting the points appropriate to its needs and resources. We are also committed to showing solidarity across the Region and to sharing knowledge, best practice and expertise.

Responsibilities
10.   We, the Ministers of Health of the Member States in the WHO European Region, commit ourselves to supporting the implementation of the following measures, in accordance with each country’s constitutional structures and policies and national and subnational needs, circumstances and resources:

  • enforce mental health policy and legislation that sets standards for mental health activities and upholds human rights;

  • coordinate responsibility for the formulation, dissemination and implementation of policies and legislation relevant to mental health within government;

  • assess the public mental health impact of government action;

  • eliminate stigma and discrimination and enhance inclusion by increasing public awareness and empowering people at risk;

  • offer people with mental health problems choice and involvement in their own care, sensitive to their needs and culture;

  • review and if necessary introduce equal opportunity or anti-discrimination legislation;

  • promote mental health in education and employment, communities and other relevant settings by increasing collaboration between agencies responsible for health and other relevant sectors;

  • prevent risk factors where they occur, for instance, by supporting the development of working environments conducive to mental health and creating incentives for the provision of support at work or the earliest return for those who have recovered from mental health problems;

  • address suicide prevention and the causes of harmful stress, violence, depression, anxiety and alcohol and other substance use disorders;

  • recognize and enhance the central role of primary health care and general practitioners and strengthen their capacity to take on responsibility for mental health;

  • develop community-based services to replace care in large institutions for those with severe mental health problems;

  • enforce measure that end inhumane and degrading care;

  • enhance partnerships between agencies responsible for care and support such as health, benefits, housing, education and employment;

  • include mental health in the curricula of all health professionals and design continuous professional education and training programmes for the mental health workforce;

  • encourage the development of specialized expertise within the mental health workforce, to address the specific needs of groups such as children, young people, older people and those with long-term and severe mental health problems;

  • provide sufficient resources for mental health, considering the burden of disease, and make investment in mental health an identifiable part of overall health expenditure, in order to achieve parity with investments in other areas of health;

  • develop surveillance of positive mental well-being and mental health problems, including risk factors and help-seeking behaviour, and monitor implementation;

  • commission research when and where knowledge or technology is insufficient and disseminate findings.

11.    We will support nongovernmental organizations active in the mental health field and stimulate the creation of nongovernmental and service user organizations. We particularly welcome organizations active in:

  • organizing users who are engaged in developing their own activities, including the setting up and running of self-help groups and training in recovery competencies;

  • empowering vulnerable and marginalized people and advocating their case;

  • providing community-based services involving users;

  • developing the caring and coping skills and competencies of families and carers, and their active involvement in care programmes;

  • setting up schemes to improve parenting, education and tolerance and to tackle alcohol and other substance use disorders, violence and crime;

  • developing local services that target the needs of marginalized groups;

  • running help lines and internet counselling for people in crisis situations, suffering from violence or at risk of suicide;

  • creating employment opportunities for disabled people.

12.   We call upon the European Commission and the Council of Europe to support the implementation of this WHO Mental Health Declaration for Europe on the basis of their respective competences.


13.   We request the Regional Director of WHO Europe to take action in the following areas:

(a) Partnership

  • encourage cooperation in this area with intergovernmental organizations, including the European Commission and the Council of Europe.

(b) Health information

  • i. support Member States in the development of mental health surveillance;

  • ii. produce comparative data on the state and progress of mental health and mental health services in Member States.

(c) Research

  • i. establish a network of mental health collaborating centres that offer opportunities for international partnerships, good quality research and the exchange of researchers;

  • ii. produce and disseminate the best available evidence on good practice, taking into account the ethical aspects of mental health.

(d) Policy and service development

i. support governments by providing expertise to underpin mental health reform through effective mental health policies that include legislation, service design, promotion of mental health and prevention of mental health problems;

ii. offer assistance with setting up "train the trainer" programmes;

iii. initiate exchange schemes for innovators;

iv. assist with the formulation of research policies and questions;

v. encourage change agents by setting up a network of national leaders of reform and key civil servants.

(e) Advocacy

  • i. inform and monitor policies and activities that will promote the human rights and inclusion of people with mental health problems and reduce stigma and discrimination against them;

  • ii. empower users, carers and nongovernmental organizations with information and coordinate activities across countries;

  • iii. support Member States in developing an information base to help empower the users of mental health services;

  • iv. facilitate international exchanges of experience by key regional and local non governmental organizations;

  • v. provide the media, nongovernmental organizations and other interested groups and individuals with objective and constructive information.

14.   We request the WHO Regional Office for Europe to take the necessary steps to ensure that mental health policy development and implementation are fully supported and that adequate priority and resources are given to activities and programmes to fulfil the requirements of this Declaration.

15.   We commit ourselves to reporting back to WHO on the progress of implementation of  this Declaration in our countries at an intergovernmental meeting to be held before 2010.

 

top top

4.   MENTAL HEALTH IN ITALY  - LAW 180: The 1978  REFORM ACT


WHO - The world health report
             Mental health reform in Italy
Box 4.4

                                                          http://www.who.int/whr/2001/chapter4/en/index1.html

Twenty years ago the Italian Parliament passed "Law 180" which aimed to bring about a radical change in psychiatric care throughout the country. The law comprised framework legislation (legge quadro), entrusting regions with the tasks of drafting and implementing detailed norms, methods, and timetables for the translation of the law's general principles into specific action. For the management of psychiatric illness, three alternatives to mental hospitals have been set up: psychiatric beds in general hospitals; residential, non-hospital facilities, with full-time or part-time staff; and non-residential, outpatient facilities, which include day hospitals, day centres, and outpatient clinics.1

In the first 10 years following approval of the law, the number of mental hospital residents dropped by 53%. The total number discharged over the past two decades is, however, not known precisely. Compulsory admissions, as a percentage of total psychiatric admissions, have steadily declined from about 50% in 1975 to about 20%in 1984 and 11.8% in 1994. The"revolving door" phenomenon ­ discharged patients who are re admitted ­ is evident only in areas that lack well-organized, effective, community-based services.

Even in the context of the new services, recent surveys show that psychiatric patients are unlikely to receive optimum pharmacotherapy, and evidence-based psychosocial modes of treatment are unevenly distributed across mental health services. For example, althoughpsycho-educational intervention is widely regarded as essential in the care of patients suffering from schizophrenia, only 8% of families received some form of such treatment. The scant data available seem to show that families have informally taken on some of the care for the ill relative, which was previously a responsibility of the mental hospital. At least some of the advantages to patients appear to be attributable more to everyday family support than to the services provided.

The following lessons may be drawn. First, the transition from a predominantly hospital-based service to a predominantly community-based service cannot be accomplished simply by closing the psychiatric institutions: appropriate alternative structures must be provided, as was the case in Italy. Second, political and administrative commitment is necessary if community care is to be effective. Investments have to be made in buildings, staff, training, and the provision of backup facilities. Third, monitoring and evaluation are important aspects of change: planning and evaluation should go hand in hand, and evaluation should, wherever possible, have an epidemiological basis. Last, a reform law should not only provide guidelines (as in Italy), but should be prescriptive: minimum standards need to be determined in terms of care, and in establishing reliable monitoring systems; compulsory timetables need tobe set for implementing the envisaged facilities; and central mechanisms are required for the verification, control and comparison of the quality of services.


 

Trieste: The Current Situation by Tim Kendall

 

Law 180 is as much symbolic as it is a concrete change in mental health legislation. Moreover, the degree to which Law 180 has been followed and put into effect varies enormously throughout Italy [See Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Supp 316, Vol 71: 'Focus on the Italian Reform', eds. Perris, C. & Kemali, D. (1985)].

Furthermore, Law 180 was not the first attempt to reform the Italian mental health system and its legislation. Indeed, the 1904 act underwent reform in 1968 (the Mariotti reform, Law 431) so as to allow the voluntary admission of patients to mental hospital. In addition, the 1968 amendment repealed the law obliging mental hospitals to register their admissions on a court register, and attempted to limit the size of mental hospitals to 5 wards, each with 125 beds! (It made no mention of an upper limit of persons per bed!). Nevertheless, the custodial nature of psychiatry and its base within the socially marginal mental hospital, alongside the legal powers of compulsory admission meant that few admissions to hospital were voluntary in practice and change only occurred where the mental health workers were committed to progressive practices already (Maj, M. 1985, Acta Psych. Scanda, suppl. 316, 15-25).

 

Law 180 provided for the following:

 

1. That from May 1978, there would be no first time admissions to mental hospitals thereafter with immediate effect. Anyone who had been admitted already could be readmitted until December 1981, after which time there would be no further admissions to mental Hospitals whatsoever.

 

2. That for a population of 200,000, 15 bed units (later know as Diagnosis and Cure units) were to be established within general hospitals; these would be allowed to take admissions (voluntary and compulsory) but must work alongside sectorised community based services both serving specified geographical areas. The focus of services must be the community, which the general hospital would back-up.

 

3. That compulsory admission to Diagnosis and Cure units, if a seriously ill person refused treatment, could only be on the recommendation of at least two doctors, and that a mayor acting as chief local health officer (not as a legal officer) had to approve admission. This is then reviewed by a judge at two days (as with children in custody), and may only be applied for a maximum of 7 days. Compare this to the 1983 MHA in England which allows up to 6 months compulsory treatment and is primarily invoked for those who are dangerous to themselves or others.

It is interesting to compare actual rates of the use of formal compulsion: in Trieste, population about 250,000, in the 8 year period following 1978 there were 24 sections applied. In Sheffield, pop 550, 000, during the same period, there were approximately 1152 sections applied (that’s 12 times every month!). That amounts to about a 24 fold, or a 2,400%, difference in the rate of use per head of population.

 

Law 180 also specified that

 

4. The new arrangements in community and general hospital care would retain the full range of existing staff thus protecting the staffing so that redundancies did not follow closure of the mental hospital.

 

5. No new mental hospitals can be built and existing ones cannot be used as parts of the general hospitals D & C units. (Maj, 1985).

 

6. Special hospitals and the University clinics were not incorporated into the new reforms.

 

[ For 1-4 see Tansella, M. (1987), The Italian Experience and its Implications, (Editorial) Psychological Medicine, 17, 283-289.] & (Maj, 1985).

Maj (1985) summarised the overall effects as follows:

 

Firstly, that dangerousness was no longer used as a criteria for commitment. Commitment was to be restricted to therapeutic emergencies.

 

Secondly, that compulsory admission must be in a General Hospital D & C units, not in a mental hospital.

 

Thirdly, that prolonged hospitalisation was discouraged (with a maximum of 7 days admission for the compulsory patient).

 

And finally, that the mental hospital was officially abolished.
 

cf.: Trieste: The Current Situation by Tim Kendall

      http://human-nature.com/hraj/trieste.html

 

cf.: The Italian asylum law: moving towards the deinstitutionalization model

     Giuseppe Dell’Acqua Mental Health Department — Trieste ( Italy)

       http://www.pol-it.org/ital/italianmodel.htm

 

cf.:  Residential care in Italy : National survey of non-hospital facilities

      G. DE GIROLAMO, MD and A. PICARDI
      http://bjp.rcpsych.org/cgi/content/full/181/3/220

top top

7.   WHO - HOW CAN HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS effectively deal with the major
           health care needs of HOMELESS  people?


WHO - How can health care systems effectively deal with the major
                health care needs of homeless people?

Twenty  January 2005

ABSTRACT

This is a Health Evidence Network (HEN) synthesis report focusing on the evidence of effective treatment

for the types of ill-health from which homeless people often suffer.

Homeless people constitute a heterogeneous population characterized by multiple morbidity (primarily

alcohol and drug dependence, and mental disorders) and premature mortality. The problems need to be

addressed by many measures, requiring a focused primary health care system and multi-agency

cooperation.

Keywords

HOMELESS PERSONS
DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE – organization and administration
HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND
META-ANALYSIS
EUROPE

Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office to:

• by e-mail : publicationrequests@euro.who.int (for copies of publications)
                   permissions@euro.who.int (for permission to reproduce them)
                   pubrights@euro.who.int (for permission to translate them)

• by post Publications
                  WHO Regional Office for Europe
                  Scherfigsvej 8
                  DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark

© World Health Organization 2005

Summary

The issue............................................................................................................ 4

Findings............................................................................................................... 4

Policy considerations.............................................................................................. 4

Introduction.......................................................................................................... 5

Sources for this review............................................................................................ 6

Barriers to health care for the homeless .................................................................. 6

Primary health care for theless................................................................................ 6

Patterns of morbidity and mortality among the homeless .......................................... 7

Health care needs of the homeless......................................................................... 7

Medical................................................................................................................ 7

Drug dependence-related....................................................................................... 8

Sexual behaviour-related..................................................................................... 10

Alcohol dependence-related.................................................................................. 10

Mental health-related........................................................................................... 11

Conclusions ....................................................................................................... 12

References ........................................................................................................................ 13

top top

 

cover

The social situation in the European Union 2004
This report is published annually by the Employment and Social Affairs DG and EUROSTAT. It provides an overview of population trends, living conditions and social coherence in the European Union. This year the report seeks to portray the social dimension of the enlarged Union, looking at both social trends and emerging policy challenges. The complete report is available only in English. A summary is available in Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, Greek, Italian, German, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish.

cover

Civil Dialogue and Social Policy in an enlarged European Union
As part of the dialogue with civil society, a conference organised jointly by the Social Platform of European NGOs and the European Commission under the auspices of its Employment and Social Affairs DG, was held in Budapest on 23–24 June 2003. It is available in English, French and German.

cover

Social Agenda No. 9 – EU health and safety rules at work
In the light of recent changes in work and society, this issue is devoted to the EU's Strategy for Health and Safety at Work. Other topics include, among other things, increasing life expectancy in the new Member States, EU anti-discrimination policy, and the future of the Enlarged Social Europe. It is available in English, French and German.

toptop