Regarding both presentations about local Social and Health System in relation also to
  NAP/Incl : what drew your attention most ?  initiative – idea – program, proposal…

  About Dignity & Health – Right & Access to services  with "Users’ participation,  visiting
  the daily practices...    What is your appreciation about the centres that you visited
          and where you had the exchanges ?cf.: http://www.smes-europa.org/D&H-II_2P_Institutions_ROMA.htm 

  In relation to the centers you visited, according to you,  what were the ‘good/efficient
   practices’ criteria?   Could you enumerate them  (most important = first one ,
           least important = last one) and make comments about each of them?

  What is "transferable" in your country and what is not so easily transferable and why ?

  Did you find that visiting a project could be an inspiration for your job and present some
  political proposals for the programs in your country ? With which project(s) would you
          like to network and develop exchanges?

  Have you any personal reflection / evaluation / suggestion to do about any of the daily
  practice in the place(s) you visited/had exchanges ?

  Which of the new ideas/methods/experiences could be useful for your country and you
  could share with your partners ?

  About D&H/-1P Organisation, what is your appreciation? What was best? What went wrong?
  What would you suggest to remove from the organization of program?

  What would you propose - for the next programs regarding:
  1)  Presentations     2)  Visits    3)  Organisation?

   Have you any complementary question – desiderata – request or criticism ?
   THANK YOU !